The DOJ Still Wants Google to Sell Off Chrome

The US judiciary wants Google Stopped selling it Chrome browser As part of the proposal of its final remedy Landmark Antitrast CaseThe

The proposal filed on Friday afternoon told that “Google immediately and completely Chrome, any resource or services needed to successfully completed the successful and successfully, are subject to the court and the plaintiff approved by the plaintiff approved by the plaintiff.” It also requires Google to stop paying partners for the desired treatment of the search engine.

Deoz also claims that Google offers a new joint venture, cooperation or partnership with any company that competes with Google in search or search text ads. However, the company no longer has to divest its artificial intelligence investment, which was part of the preliminary set of the recommendation issued by the plaintiff last November. The company will still need to give a previous AI investment notice.

“Its perfect size and unlimited energy has taken away the customers and business of a basic promise to Google public – the right to choose between competitive services,” the DOJ statement with the filed claim. “Google’s illegal behavior has created an economic goal, it destroys the destruction on the market so that it is confirmed that whatever happens – Google always wins.”

Since the year-long fight for the DOJ in the sixties, DOG has officially returned his case against Google, the most significant technology of disbelief since the DOJ’s year-long fight. The case alleged that Google used anticipative techniques to protect its search and fraud the contracts that confirm it as a default search engine on the web browser and smartphone. Claiming the case, the case has claimed that Google Auction can adjust the auction system through which it sells ads and raise prices for advertisers and earn more earning from there.

Google argued that its overwhelming success in the search – it has about 90 percent share in the US market – stoms from the best search technology company it also says that customers are easily able to change their default search engines and are facing competition from Google Microsoft and others.

Google spokesman Peter Scottenfels said in an email statement, “The DOJ’s obvious proposals are going a few miles out of the court’s decision and will harm American customers, economics and national protection.”

Case Went to trial in 2023And the US District Judge for Colombia District on Aug 2024, Amit Mehta Roy that Google Has maintained an illegal exclusiveBoth in general search and general search text ad.

Most ruling device manufacturers and browser partners are focused on Google’s contract, which uses Google as their default search technology. According to Mehta’s verdict, nearly 5 percent of the search searches in the United States occur through the portals where the Google default search engine. Google then shares the revenue with those partners, providing a few billion dollars to them, which prevents small quest competitors who cannot compete with this deal, Mehta said.