Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

ReutersIndia is the fifth largest economy in the world.
Yet, a recent legacy of protectionism and commercial policies aimed at interior have retained their global competitiveness.
This Tariffs are high And the share of global exports remains below 2%. The huge domestic market in India nourishes its growth – ahead of many others, the economists say, to a large extent because the rest of the world slows down. But in a tumultuous, increasingly professional era, India’s instance instinct can strangely serve as a short-term shield.
As the countries quarrel to calibrate in response to the displacement of trade policies in the US-as Donald Trump’s last 90-day tariff pause after weeks of bumping into India’s sacramental break may have helped the meteorological shocks that have shaken more economies that depend on commerce.
“The lower exposure of India of global goods can work in our favor. If export-run economies are slowed down under tariff pressure and we continue to increase by 6%, we will start to look stronger for comparison with the large internal market,” says Rajuvari Seniwari, ” Mumbai based in Mumbai.
“To be shy has become an advantage – but we cannot afford complacency. In order to take advantage of the new opportunities, India has to stay first and open more in order to trade gradually and strategically,” she adds.
It may not be easy given India’s long and complex relationships with trade barriers and tariffs.
AFPIn his book, India’s trade policy: 90s and then, the economist of the University of Colombia and noted commercial expert Arvind Panagaria traces the complex and often inconsistent evolution of India’s approach to commerce.
During the interwar years, industries such as textiles and iron and steel lobbied for – and obtained – high levels of protection. The chronic shortage of World War II led to an even further control of imports applied through a complex licensing system.
While Asian peers such as Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore switched to export strategies in the 1960s – and began to publish an impressive growth rate of 8-10% annually – India chose to double the import of imports. As a result, imports as a share of GDP shrunk from 10% in 1957-58 to only 4% until 1969-70.
Until the mid-1960s, India completely banned the import of consumer goods. Not only does this eliminate the pressure on home manufacturers to improve quality, they also refused access to world -class entrances and technologies.
As a result, Indian products have lost their competitiveness in global markets and exports in stagnation. The resulting currency deficiency has led to an even tougher import control, creating a vicious cycle that stifles growth. Between 1951 and 1981, the income per capita increased at only 1.5% a year.
The turning point came in 1991, facing a crisis of paying balance, India dismantled many import controls and left the rupee to depreciate-revenue, which gave such a necessary impetus to exporters and local producers who compete with imports. The licensing of consumer goods was completed only in 2001 after the World Trade Organization (WTO) pronounced against it.
The impact was striking: between 2002-03 and 2011–12, exports of goods and services in India increased six times, rising from $ 75 billion to over $ 400 billion.
With the liberalization of trade and other reform, the income per capita in India increased more in the first 17 years of the 21st century than in the entire 20th century, notes Prof. Panagaria.
But the retardation to trade has not ended.
The liberalization of trade in India was turned twice – in 1996-97 and again from 2018 – with the widespread use of measures to combat the disposal to block imports from the most competitive sources, according to Prof. Panagaria.
“Many post-colonial countries like India have a deeply rooted suspicion that international trade and trade are simply new forms of colonization. Unfortunately, this way of thinking is still being held among some politicians-and this is a pity,” says Vivek Dehegia, a professor of economics at the University of Carleton in Canada.
ReutersMany economists say that a decade of protectionist policies undermines the Make initiative in India by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which focuses on capital and technology sectors while removing labor -intensive industries as textiles. As a result, the program is struggling to make significant profits in production and exports.
“If foreigners cannot sell us their goods, they will not have the revenue to pay for the goods they buy from us. If we reduce our goods, they will have to reduce ours,” writes Prof. Panagaria.
Such protectionism has also led to the allegations of crome.
“Tariffs have created protectionism in several Indian industries, adopting investment in efficiency from cozy activities and allowing them to constantly collect market force by building concentrated positions,” according to Viral Acharya, Professor of Economics at New York University of Stern School of Business.
As the United States is turning inland and China under pressure, countries belonging to the European Union are fighting for reliable trading partners – and India can be one of them. In order to take advantage of this moment, economists believe that India should reduce its tariffs, increase the competitiveness of exports, and signal its discovery to global trade.
Sectors such as clothes, textiles and toys provide a golden opportunity, especially for the middle and small sectors. But after a decade of stagnation, the big question is: can they increase – and will the government support them?
If Trump followed his tariff plans after the current pause, India could see $ 7.76 billion – or $ 6.4% – a decline in US exports this year, according to the Global Commercial Initiative (GTRI) initiative, a Delhi -based brain. (In 2024 India exports goods worth $ 89 billion to the US market.)
“Trump’s tariffs are expected to strike a slight blow to the export of goods to India to the United States,” says Ajay Sriva Stri from GTRI.
He stresses the need for India to expand its commercial base after providing a balanced deal with the United States. This includes rapidly tracing agreements with the EU, the United Kingdom and Canada, while deepening ties with China, Russia, Japan, South Korea and ASEAN.
At home, the true impact depends on reforms: simpler tariffs, A more glare tax on goods and services (GST)Better commercial processes and fair application of quality control. Without them, India risks missing the global moment.
Follow BBC News India on Instagram., YouTube., Twitter and FacebookS