Amazon TRIBE judges New York Times Over Story, which is said to have led to porn dependent claims

The Amazon tribe filed a case against the New York Times (NYT) on a community report that will access high -speed Internet, which its members are labeled as porn dependent.

The defamation case states that the US newspaper report presents the Marubo tribe as “unable to cope with the main internet exposure” and stressed “allegations that their youth was consumed by pornography.”

The trial also described TMZ and Yahoo as defendants and stated that their news stories “make fun of their youth” and “missed their traditions.”

Nyt said his report said that none of the tribe members was addicted to porn. TMZ and YAHOO were related to comment.

Marubo, a local community of about 2000 people, is looking for at least $ 180 million (£ 133 million).

NYT’s story, written nine months after Marubo gained access to Starlink, a satellite service on the Internet from SpaceX by Elon Musk, said the tribe “has already been fighting the same challenges that has gathered American households for years.”

This included “teenagers glued to phones”, “violent video games” and “minors watching pornography,” the report said.

It states that the community leader and vocal critic of the Internet is “the most relaxed of pornography” and has been told “more aggressive sexual behavior” by young men.

The report also notes the accepted benefits of the Internet among the tribe, including the ability to alert authorities to health problems and the destruction of the environment and to keep in touch with the Faraway family.

The lawsuit claims that other news issues have been sensitive to the NYT report, including a TMZ title mentioning porn addiction.

The answer prompted NYT to start a Subsequent report About a week after its original story, with the title: “No, a remote Amazon tribe did not become addicted to porn.”

The report states that “more than 100 websites around the world” have published titles that are falsely claimed to have been addicted to porn. “

But the trial claims that NYT’s original story “presented people from Marubo as a community that could not cope with the main internet exposure, emphasizing the allegations that their youth was consumed by pornography.”

The name plaintiffs, the community leader Enoco Marubo and the Brazilian activist Flora Dutra, who helped distribute $ 20,000 Starlink’s antennas to the tribe, said the NYT history had helped to feed a Global Media Storm, according to the News Service.

This, they said, subjected them to “humiliation, harassment and irreparable harm to their reputation and safety.”

TMZ’s story included video footage of Marubo and Dutra, spreading the antennas that they said that “created the infallible impression (they) introduced harmful, sexually explicit materials in the community and facilitated the alleged moral and social disintegration.”

A New York Times spokesman said: “Every reading of this piece shows a sensitive and nuanced study of the benefits and complications of new technologies in a remote root village with a proud history and preserved culture.

“We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against the case.”