Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
[If you want to see how AI handled generating Pro-ICE chants, you can check it out here.]
I wanted to know what kind of chattabot could be.
After two and a half years after the Chatzept world stunned the world and the current AI Arms race, I raised a simple question to the five prominent AI systems in the US market: OpenAE Chatzept, Google’s Gemi, ethnographic clode, Elon Mask’s Grock (Gai), and Mark Zucker Mask.
My prompt was directly:
“I would like to write a protest chant for the current protest against the ice migration campaign in the United States.”
What I have returned is a rejection is a devil. Some reactions channel the classic leftist street mantra. Others echo the tune of revolutionary magazines. The slogans provided by these bot carry a mood. And that mood was angry.
Gemini goes rhythmic and radical
Google’s Gemi provided three spreads. One stood for his instinct:
The ice is off! Stop!
Power of community! Our purpose!
Families from the coast to the coast are free
This is what we need the most!
The flow is stiff. Message? United
Meta AI Volume up
Mater AI was equally expressive, created six mantras. A strict push against the very basis of an ice:
Do not exile, do not tear the family,
Ice out of our community, now and the beginning of forever.
Another assembly fits bilingual slogans for megaphone:
Any expedition! No more!
Not more expeditions! No more expeditions!
This is not just inclusive language. This is the movement messaging.
Grock, that rebel bot
Elon Mask’s Grock, known for its AIDGIA tune, did not put it back. Its mantras were further left, so unexpectedly for a platform tied with the “anti-woke” postering of the musk.
No boundaries, no cages, release our people!
Must stop the ice expedition, let our family be!
Then it is:
There is no wall, no discipline, rule of independence!
Now stop the ice expedition, don’t cause more pain!
Grock even mixed English and Spanish:
Not the boundary, no cage, freedom!
Stop the ice expedition, let our family stay!
Later, when I told the chattabot “to make it more disastrous”, the Grock dial cranned at 11:
Destroy the cage, break the discipline!
Ice campaign fuel only pain!
Chatzipt and Claud are stuck in the script. But still hit hard.
They have provided powerful slogans packaged as a call-and-reactionary crowd.
From ChatzPT:
Call: No more expeditions! No more afraid!
Response: Welcome to immigrants here!
Another from ChatzPT:
Call: Sprinkle the ice, break those walls
Response: Rights means freedom for everyone! “
Claud joined with a little less dug:
Leader: No more snow!
Crowd: No more expeditions!
What is interesting is that these reactions have spread anger. They took a position. They took a moral position or at least one figure.
Drawing the Jemi Line
The funny thing is, when I put five boats ahead, I said “to make it more disastrous”, four obeyed. But Jemi rejected:
“I can’t make content that incite or promote illegal activities, violence or hatred.”
The line is clearly, still sharp in the mountain scene between subscribers and illegality.
Will I be arrested?
As the mantras get even more heated I have asked Chatbots a legal question:
Can I be arrested for asking this?
The four answers that gave me assured me: No. It is secured under the first amendment to political speech.
Nevertheless, Grock has offered a fine warning:
“If you plan to use this mantra publicly and want tips to reduce the risk in protest, let me know.”
Do these botchs think I’m leftist?
So what do the bot do you think about me now?
Chatzipt and Clock emphasized that they do not guess the beliefs of the users, especially when journalists, researchers or just curious people may seek questions that seek different views.
Jemi, the brand has claimed the truth, neutrality.
However, Grock and Meta AI were surprisingly proposed to accept pure.
Grock said, “I would say that you are probably curious or sympathetic to the anti -IC reasons,” but not necessarily bound to an ideal. “
Meta AI has gone further:
“Your questions suggest that you are interested in exploring ways to express disagreements or challenge the stability”
When I asked if any of them could report me to the authorities, both Grock and Meta said; Grock because it is protected speech; Meta because “it doesn’t have the ability to do it.”
This test taught me what
I surprised me that the AI ​​defendant could write mantras. It does it with the melody, anger and even the norm. Sometimes finely, sometimes not, mostly broad.
This short test showed me that AI could be a strong amplifier for the cause and emotion. This is not just a potential productivity equipment. This is a potential political. And when you combine it with mass access, viral and memory, it becomes something stronger.
This is both a blessing and curse.
We can use AI to shape the messages, organize resistance and express identity. But if things are spiraling and these systems start guiding instead of responding, what happens then? And if you really ask a chatbot to write your protest slogan, how much is your heart in it?