International Nuclear Watchdog Issues Stark Warning in Wake of US Iran Strikes

The concept of attacking the facilities working for nuclear power development can immediately think of the worst images of disaster like Chernobyl and Fukushima. However, experts say that these strikes hit important materials, but it is unlikely to achieve a large -scale nuclear disaster in uranium enrichment sites. IAA, despite concern about broad radiation Maintenance In the previous update issued on Sunday, Grosie said “it” does not expect that there will be any health consequences for people or the environment outside the target site. “

IAEA says the largest current environmental risk from these sites is local. Uranium enrichment facilities contain toxic gas and chemicals, which are similar to the fact that any large industry will be stored in chemical plants.

The elements of the rich benefits of the rich benefits, Olfstal said, “There is still no place where it can reach a chain response where it can maintain a large -scale nuclear explosion.” (IAEA assumes that Iran’s rich uranium has a reserve up to 60 percent – not yet High enough To make nuclear weapons according to nuclear scientists’ bulletin. IAEA reported in January that it was found to have sufficiently rich uranium Fordo site)

“You have gasoline in your car,” he said. “You have a collision with your car or accident, you may be on fire, it may even be exploded Rease has some toxic ingredients that can be released but it is going to be fairly limited damage.”

He also added, there is an opportunity, attacks on Isfahan can damage the cas containing uranium hexaflooride gas, a radioactive chemical compound, which can spread across this region. However, this national explosion can probably be limited to opportunities.

“It’s just a large, heavy gas molecule, so it won’t go too far,” Emily Caffere, Emily Caffere, Director of Health Physics Program at Alabama University of Birmingham, Stated ABC News.

Iran has an advantage that can cause significant damage to the injury. Iran’s only commercial nuclear reactor is located near the city of Busheh; There are thousands of kg of nuclear material through chain reactions to produce fuel on the site. (Research reactors, like Isfahan, use much less fuel than commercial reactors and operates at much lower temperatures, making them less dangerous in accidents)) Comment Delivery a day before the US strike, Grosy said that the strike on this plant “can be very high in the environment.” Israeli government said last week that its own strike hit Bushar, but later Israeli officials These claims are backThe

“In my technical evaluation, attacking a nuclear reactor is really, in fact, in fact, really dumb,” says Wolfstal.

There is a greater, long -term environmental threat to the hand: Iran has the opportunity to take final action after these attacks to create nuclear weapons in reality.

“Both Israel and the United States of the United States have nuclear weapons and invaded Iran,” Wolfstal said, it is not lost to anyone. ” “Russia has nuclear weapons and does not have Ukraine. North Korea, who has nuclear weapons, is quite sitting. The message here is that nuclear weapons bring you the power to protect and immunity and give you the power to take action against your opponents.

Grosy’s comments echoed the concern on Monday.

“One thing is sure, and that is the simple fact: we won’t be safe if there are more nuclear weapons in more states around the world.”