Vitalik Buterin has reservations about Sam Altman’s World project

Vitalic Booterin, co-founder of Etherium, argues that the digital identification method promoted by Sam Altman’s World Project is at risk of actual privacy.

Formerly known as WorldCaynThe world was created under Alex Blania’s equipment for Ultman and humanity. The company says that it could Help to distinguish between AI agents and people The users scan the eye balls and create a unique identity for them in the blockchain.

In A long postBootarin mentions that the world’s usage is the method Zero Human identity verification is also being searched by various digital passports and digital ID projects when anonymity. And he acknowledges that “surface” using a “Z-twisted digital ID” “can protect all types of internet services against our social media, voting and sebils and bot, without compromising with all privacy”.

However, Bootarin has suggested that this method still burst into a “Person” ID system, which creates significant risks.

“In the real world, there are usually multiple accounts in pseudonym … So under one-Person ID, even though Z is twisted, we risk coming closer to a world where all your activities must be under the identity of the single public,” he wrote. “In the rising risk world (eg drones), there are significant downsides to remove the option to protect yourself through pseudonym.”

As an example of a scenario of risk, Bootarin noted that the US government has recently started Students and scholars need visa applicants To set their social media accounts to the public, so that it can screen those accounts for “hostility”. Similarly, he suggested that even if there was no public link between the various accounts created under a single digital ID, “a government could force someone to express their privacy, so that they could see their entire activity.”

So, how can the real people expect to verify that the government, online services, and anyone else without compromising their privacy? Booterin is advising “polytheistic identity” to advise in favor of a approach where “there is no single influential authority, whether it is a person, or an institution or platform.”

The pluralist systems may be “obvious” (they say users to verify their identity on the basis of testimones already verified) or “Underlying” (depending on the different types of different identity systems)-they present “the best practical solutions”.

“In my view, the ideal result of the ‘one-Person’ identity projects exist today is that if they are integrated with the socio-graph-based identity,” Booterin said in conclusion.