Inside the Summit Where China Pitched Its AI Agenda to the World

Three days later Trump has revealed the administration’s widely expected AI Action PlanThe Chinese government had its own AI policy blueprint. What time was the coincidence? I suspect it.

China’s “Global AI Governance Action Plan” was published on July 26, the first day of China’s largest annual AI event, the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WIC). Jeffrey Hinton and Eric Shmidt were among the many Western technology industries participating in the festivals of Shanghai. Our wired colleague Will Night was also in the scene.

Waike’s Vibes were the opposite pole of Trump America-first, control-light vision For AI, Will tells me. In his inaugural address, Chinese Premier Lee Kiang made a transparent case for the importance of global cooperation in AI. After that, there was a series of prominent Chinese AI researchers, who seem to brush the Trump administration mostly to have given technical discussions by raising urgent questions.

One of China’s top AI research institutes, Jho Bowen, the leader of the AI Lab, contested his team’s work on AI protection. He further suggested that the government could play a role in monitoring commercial AI models for weakness.

In an interview with Ward, Professor of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and one of the country’s top voices in the AI, Yeh Jang said he hopes that AI security agencies have found ways to cooperate around the world. “It would be best if the United States, the United States, China, Singapore and other institutes were combined,” he said.

The conference also included the Closed Door Meeting on the issues related to the AI protection policy. Speaking after he participated in a Confab, he told Paul Trialo Wird, a partner of the Advisory Agency DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group that the discussion was productive despite the significant absence of American leadership. With the United States of the United States, “China, Singapore, the United Kingdom and EU co-leading Major AI protection players will now try to build maintenance around the Frontier AI model development,” Trolo told Ward. He also added that it was not just the US government that was missing: all of the US AI labs sent only Elon Mask’s Jai workers to join the YEC forum.

Many Western visitors were surprised to find out how much the conversation about the AI in China around the security rules. Brian TSE, founder of Beijing-based AI Protection Research Institute Concordia AI, told me, “You can literally participate in AI protection events in the last seven days. Earlier this week, Konkardia AI Stuart Russell and Joshua Benzio organized a long-standing AI-Senior Forem.

Switching position

Compared with China’s AI Blueprint with Trump’s action plan, it has shown that both countries have changed their position. When Chinese companies first advanced AI models started developing, many observers thought they would be left behind by the censorship requirements imposed by the government. Now, US leaders say they want to confirm homegrown AI models “Following the objective truth”, an attempt that is as my colleague Steven Levi Wrote Last week Back -channel Newsletter, “a cruel practice of the top-down ideological bias.” China’s AI Action Plan, already, is like a globalist declaration: It suggests that the United Nations helps lead international AI efforts and suggests that the government should play an important role in controlling technology.

Although their governments are very different, when it comes about AI protection, people are concerned about many of the homosexuals: Model hallucinations, discrimination, risk of existence, cyberquacy weakness, etc. The United States and China are trained on the same raging law and use the same type of scaling law and the same. Academic research on protection is being converted into fields such as the development of scalables in two countries (how people can monitor AI models with other AI models) and the development of interconfirmable security test standards.