Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A federal judge on Tuesday ruled some good news and bad news for the tech giant in a high-profile disbelief case against Google. The good news for Google is that it doesn’t have to sell its Chrome browser, it was a real probability. Google stock has increased after the news trading a few hours later.
The bad news for Google was that it needed to share data with its rivals and many could not sign the exclusive agreement that helped the company be so influential in the industry.
Roy, which is available Court audienceAmit P. US District Court Judge Amit P. for Colombia district. Came from Mehta, who first ruled August 2024 Google’s search business was an illegal exclusive.
“Google will not need to divest chrome; or the court will not include an continuous part of the Android operating system in the final judgment,” the judgment said. “The plaintiffs have surpassed these main resources for the mandatory deviation, which Google has not used to influence any illegal restraint.”
There are about 3.5 billion users in the Chrome browser, which when you remember that there are about 8.1 billion people on the entire planet, you are very impressive. And the AI company’s confusion has even offered an unreasonable offer by Chrome Last monthAlthough it was considered a stunt by many technical industry observers. According to the Wall Street Journal, the confusion was giving $ 34.5 billion dollars, but only then it was worth about 18 billion dollars.
Tuesday’s verdict explained that Google needs to be shared with “search index and user-intercept data” with “eligible contestants”. The verdict also states that the company will be forbidden to enter or maintain any exclusive agreement related to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant and Gemi Application, “although there are many engraved out that will allow Google to enter the agreement to not damage the flowing business.
According to the verdict, Google will not need to be submitted to its products or its Android distributor partners to do so. And it does not have to underwrite public education nationwide public education.
Reached for comments via email, a Google spokesperson gave Gizmodo a statement in a statement Published online::
Earlier today, a US court, which monitored the judiciary case on how we distribute the search today, issued a decision on the next step.
Today’s decision recognizes how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI, which is giving people many more ways to find information. It has underlined what we are saying since it was filed in 2021: Competition is intense and people can easily choose their favorite services. Therefore We do not agree So strongly about the responsibility of the court’s initial decision on August 2024.
Now we have imposed limitations on how we distribute Google services and sharing the search data with our rivals. We have concerns about how these requirements will affect our users and their privacy and we are reviewing the decision closely. The court acknowledged that Chrome and Android would have gone beyond the focus of the case in the diverted search distribution and could harm the customers and our partners.
As usual, how important we are focusing on – creating innovative products that people like and prefer.
At least one of Google’s contestants was dissatisfied with the verdict of being too much of a technology company. “We do not believe that the court will force the remedies to be ordered by Change To add to Google’s illegal behavior to adequately, “a spokeswoman for Dakadakgo told Gizmodo in an email on Tuesday.
“Google will still be allowed to continue its exclusive use to retain competitors with AI search,” the spokesman also said. “As a result, customers will continue to be harmed. We believe that Congress should take Google now to make the most frightening thing faster: compete in a level playground.”
It seems very likely that some of the Google Trump administration will be involved in the lobbying of the screen because the case has been filed. President Trump regularly met with the powerful people in the business world, it did not have any secret that he did regularly as he did with the Intel CEO Lip B-Tan or the Apple’s CEO Tim Cook.
Trump has publicly lumps B-Tan but then met with Intel’s chief, causing the US government to accept an 10% partner In the organization. The move was shocked by many on Wall Street, even among the people who support the President. However, it looks like Trump he thinks it is willing to interfere with personal businesses for its convenience.
Will Trump somehow make a drama for Google? The tech giant does not require cash injection like Intel. When the grace of strong interests is needed, there is always something for the business. Million has contributed 1 million to Google Trump’s inaugural fund, and Google’s CEO visited Trump on Mar-a-Lago shortly after the beautiful Pichai election.
Even before the inauguration of Pichai Trump was seen in the Church service on January 28, 2021, just behind Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cook and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Google should be very interesting to see what happens as soon as it appeals.
