Screw the money — Anthropic’s $1.5B copyright settlement sucks for writers

About half a million authors will be eligible for at least $ 3,000 salary, a class action suit -Historic Tihasik in Mocadma thanks for the $ 1.5 billion settlement that a group of authors brought EthnographicThe

This marks the landmark disposal The largest pay In the history of US copyright law, but this is not a victory for the authors – this is another win for technology companies.

Tech giants are racing to collect the written material as possible for training their LLMs, which are the power groundbreaking AI chat products like ChatzPT and Clock – the same products that endanger creative art, even though their results are. MilkuestThe These AIs may become more sophisticated while eating more data but basically after scraping the entire Internet, these companies are literally sense Run New information.

This is why the organization behind Cloe is anthropological anthropological, “a few million books pirated”Shade library“And feeding them in AI. This special case, Bertz vs. anthropologistsMeta, Google, OpenAI and one of the few dozen filed against organization Mid -journey AI of training in copyrighted work AI.

But the authors are not getting this settlement because their work was fed to an AI – it was just an expensive slap on the wrist for anthropology, a company that was barely raised More 13 billion dollarsBecause it has downloaded illegally instead of buying books.

In June, Federal Judge William Alsup Ethnographic And the verdict is that it is legal to train II to copyrighted elements. The judge argued that this use case is “converter” that is enough to keep in order to be protected by fair usage, a carving of copyright law Not updated Since 1976.

The judge said, “An aspiring of any reader to be a writer, not competing in front of ethnographic LLMs and training them to replicate or suppress them – rather than turning a strong angle and creating something else,” the judge said.

It was a pirate – not AI training – which the judge managed to bring the case to the case for trial, but there is no need for a trial with ethnic settlement.

“Today’s settlement, if approved, will solve the remaining inheritance demands of the plaintiffs,” said Aparna Sridhar, Deputy General Council of the ethnicity, in a statement. “We are committed to the development of safe AI systems that people and companies help to increase their ability, advance scientific discoveries and solve complex problems.”

Since a dozens of cases go to court on the relationship between AI and copyrighted work, the judges are now to refer to the Bertz vs ethnographic as a precedent. However, in view of the steps of these decisions, some other judge will probably reach a different decision.