US exclusion is outlined as Trump and Democrats end a meeting without a deal

The United States is heading to excluding the government on Tuesday night and it seems that there is a small appetite on both sides of the guerrilla division to avoid it.

The last meeting between President Donald Trump and democratic leaders in Congress has made little progress. If nothing else, both sides dig deeper into their positions.

“I think we have turned to exclusion because the Democrats will not do the right thing,” said Vice President J. D. Vance in front of reporters after the White House meeting. “You do not put a gun on the head of the American people and you do not say,” Unless you do exactly what the Senate and Democrats of the Chamber want you to do, we will close your government. “

Democratic Senate leader Chuck Sumer said there were still “very big differences” between his party and the White House.

No one sounded optimistic.

These positions hardened even more on Monday night after Trump published obscenely, AI video, mocking the democratic leadership.

He depicts the leader of minorities in the Hakem Jeffrens house, dressed in sombrero and fake mustaches, and Sumer says in an artificial voice that undocumented migrants should get free healthcare. Both men responded angrily, with Jeffrris calling him fanaticism.

With regard to the essential demands from each country, Republicans want a short-term extension of current cost levels-the essence of the legislation can be a little further on the road.

They are pleased with the way things are going, especially since the Trump administration applies cost redundancies on its own without the help of congress congresses.

Democrats want this practice to end.

What is the point, they wonder that by negotiating agreements at the level of expense, if Trump will simply ignore them?

They also want a solid agreement on the renewal of government subsidies for low-income health insurance subsidies who expire at the end of the year or something that Republicans are reluctant to do so far.

These are negotiations on the positions of both countries, but the battles to exclude the government are more than policy – they are for politics.

Republicans believe they have political height.

The party, which claims in return for making the government open – in this case the Democrats – usually receives the lion’s share of guilt when an exclusion occurs.

Trump and Republican Congress leaders already claim that they are reasonable.

They are the ones who say who just want to buy more time to negotiate without the adverse effects of stopping.

Of course, the Democrats do not see it that way.

They believe that healthcare is a profitable problem for them, so they want the debate about whether millions of Americans will lose their ability to afford medical insurance.

The temporary financing of the government for seven weeks, according to them, simply moves this deadline for subsidization, without any significant progress.

Complicating all this for Democrats is the reality that many Republicans seem to be in peace with an extended closure of the government.

The White House budget chief Rus Water has recently spread a memorandum, explaining how the Trump administration will use stopping to make new, long -term reductions in federal costs and employment.

The positions and government programs, considered “insignificant” during the closure, will be permanently closed – the expansion of the Ministry of Government Government (Doge) from earlier this year.

But democratic leaders seem to think that threats are a bluff or tactics for negotiation.

Senate’s minority leader Chuck Sumer called him “an attempt to intimidate”.

“Donald Trump has fired federal workers from day one – not to manage, but to scare,” Sumer said. “This is nothing new and it has nothing to do with the government funding.”

Sumer and his colleagues democratic leaders of the congress are also under intense pressure from their political base to behave quickly before Republican attacks.

In March, the Senate Democrats were confronted with drying criticism from their own party to reach a six -month expense agreement with Republicans, even when Trump was in the midst of his Dodge budget campaign.

This time, the Democrats may feel forced to cause exclusion to demonstrate their determination.

In the end, however, the switching battle is a testament test. This is a test of which country is most capable of tolerating political pain.

Democrats can see the benefit of fighting Republicans, but will they be ready to stand as valued federal programs and government services-including those for low-income Americans closed?

Republicans can talk hard to reduce the government, but as the current party they could lose most if the public mood is drastically destroyed.

The most exclusion of the government during the first term of Trump lasted 35 days, setting a record as the longest in American history.

Although the duel was above the spending of the proposed border wall of the President in the United States and Mexico, it ended because the federal air traffic controllers-which worked without paying-starting to stay home, threatening huge interruptions for US airplane travel.

Exclusion can be unpredictable. And although both sides look itching for battle, it will not be said when or how this battle will end.