Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Open the White House Watch newspaper for free
Your guide to what the 2024 US election means for Washington and the world
It’s an amazing thing. In the year Between the 1980s and the late 1990s, the English-speaking world saw an explosion of concern about inequality, with the gap between the rich and the poor on both sides of the Atlantic becoming increasingly clear. But the past decade has seen a second sharp rise in public concern about income inequality. Equality measures Show no increase, or even a slight decrease.
By inequality we mean some measure of the dispersion above and below. Gini’s income inequality, which captures the overall fairness of distribution, has been flat or falling in Britain, the US and much of Western Europe over the past two decades. The ratio between the top and bottom 10 percent of income is not the same. If anything, it was falling.
The population’s concern about income gaps is clearly out of step with measured reality, but why? A concept is what people are They are really feeling it. Economic growth has been slowing down lately. This is almost certainly true, but I think there may be something else at work.
You can think of the ratio between top and bottom incomes as the product of two ratios: top and middle and gaps between middle and bottom. And the flat or collapsed double space mask covers opposite stories in these two halves of the equation.
The income disparity between the top and the middle has widened since the turn of the millennium, which resonates with the public. But at the other end of the spectrum, the gap between the bottom and the middle is narrowing significantly.

Since the late 1990s, low earners have seen rapid wage growth in the US and UK. The continued rise of the minimum wage in Britain is a big part of this story. In both countries, low-skilled workers benefited from the elimination of the middle division of labor (and middle-skilled workers suffered). Tight job market in general.
So we don’t see any increase in overall equity. The story of very low pay is unequivocally good, but for many who sit in the middle, it could be argued that the two separate trends combine to make a decision impossible.
If the middle class is looking up, the rich are pulling more. The high life feels more out of reach than ever before. But look down, and the floor is coming fast. It’s a dangerous cocktail of simultaneously adding resentment and caution, and it certainly could have gotten in the way. Recent political situations.
Careers that were once considered aspirational are on a sharp edge. In Britain, doctors, nurses and police officers have all seen their income levels decline in recent years. In the US, high-paying jobs are being shared among a few very high-profile jobs. In 1990, tech workers accounted for one in six of the 5 percent of wages, up from one in 20 wages in 1990. Before, no one team had any dominance.
This is because we think of ourselves as members of a group rather than as individuals. In the year In the 1980s, 40 percent of the highest-paying jobs in America did not require a degree. The higher levels of the income scale include many engineers and doctors, but also high school teachers and highly skilled factory and construction workers. People from all backgrounds with all skills can dream of doing this.
Today, the top end of the scale is largely dominated by technology and healthcare workers. About half of all major jobs require an advanced degree. And the vast majority of society knows at a young age that they are not on that path.
To be clear: these shifts are not by design, but organic. Economy will change. Jobs fall and fall for rewards and honors. It is a tale as old as time. But that doesn’t mean it should be ignored.
Aggregate equality statistics certainly have their place, but they can obscure important facts. And these can be even more useful in explaining how a wider segment of the population experiences differences in opportunity and outcomes. The gap between rich and poor may not be widening, but it is not unreasonable for the middle classes to feel that their position in society is declining.