Anthropic tightens usage limits for Claude Code – without telling users

From Monday morning, Claud Code users have been injured in unexpectedly limited use constraints. Problems, in which many of which have been promoted on Claud code Pomegranate PageThe service seems to be focused on heavy users, many of whom are in the highest plan of 200-a month.

Users are simply called “clode use limit”, and when the limit is reset is given a time (usually within a few hours). However, many users have reached the conclusion that their subscription has been downgrade or their use is wrongly tracked, even though there is no clear announcement of the change of limitations.

“The tracking of your use constraints has changed and it is no longer correct,” A user has complainedThe “There’s no way to 30 minutes of a few requests that I have hit in 900 messages.”

When a comment arrived for the comment, an ethnic representative confirmed the issues but denied in more detail. Representatives said, “We are aware that some of the clode code user is feeling slow reactions,” and we are working to solve these problems. “

Changes have been worrying for users who have not received any advance notice of change and have no guidance on what to expect to move forward. A user, who said not to be identified, said that since the use limit is implemented, its project has been impossible to move forward. “It just stopped the power to progress,” the user told TechCrunch. “I tried Jemi and Kimi, but now there is nothing competitive with the capacity of the Claud Code.”

These problems have arisen in addition to a wide range of problems in the ethnographic network. Many API users have reported Overload Defect During the same period, and Pages of the organization Shows six separate problems in the last four days. Significantly, the network still shows 100 percent uptime for the week.

Although loading errors are common, there has been significant confusion among the users of the new system in the limits of anthropological use, many of whom were unknown that they were subject to use limit. The part of the confusion comes from an ethnographic price determination, which determines the tiered limit without guaranteeing a certain level of access. The most expensive highest plan, is worth 200 dollars per month, promises the constraints of use More than 20 times Than a Pro subscription. Pro plans, instead of, provides the limit More than five times Than the free plan. However the ethnographic is inadvertent user’s limits said ”Will vary in accordance with demand“And the result does not set an absolute value is unable to plan to plan around users’ limits, as they have no clear idea about when their service is limited.

The $ 200 Max plan has been especially popular among heavy users in the service shown as unstable for anthropologists in the long run. The user we talked to was that they said that the plan would often allow him to make more than $ 1000 calls (measured at API prices) in a day. As a result, he was not surprised that the use limit was becoming more limited – but it is hoped that the company will communicate more clearly.

“Just be transparent,” he said. “Lack of communication can only lose confidence in them.”