Apple May Face Criminal Charges for Allegedly Lying to a Federal Judge

Apple “intentionally chose A federal judge, not to comply with a court order in order to loose the restrictions of his App Store ” Wrote on WednesdayThe

Judge Yovon Gonzalez Rogers situation mentioned in the US Attorney Office in San Francisco to “to check whether the effectiveness of criminal disobedience is suitable.”

In 2021, Gonzalez Rogers presided over On a case Have been brought Fortnite Epic Games Developed by the iPhone Manufacturer complaint Anticipative practice It has hindered developers to generate earnings from the App Store. These include the policy of taking 30 percent commission in the purchase of Apple’s specific application.

When Ganjalez Rogers In the end In most cases, in favor of Apple, he instructed the company to allow developers to start market ways to purchase the application outside the App Store Ecosystem. Apple responded By down to 2 27 percent to the purchase of purchases elsewhere, it also introduced several changes, including showing the so -called scary screen, to prevent users from shopping outside the ecosystem.

Last year, the Epic Court challenged how Apple was responding to the order, Gonzalez Rogers would have to bring back the documents to the Techol Giants to contribute to Wednesday’s disobedience.

Gonzalez Rogers wrote on Wednesday in his judgment that Apple has created its non -compliance technique to create a new anticipative barrier that maintains a valuable revenue flow in reality; a revenue flow was previously thought to be anticipative, “” It thought that this court would have a serious mistake. “

He also said that Apple Executives tried to hide the real inspirations for change. “In contrast to Apple’s primary court testimony, contemporary business documents reveal that Apple knew exactly what he was doing and chose the maximum every time AntiThe competitive alternative, “Gonzalez Rogers said. He allegedly lied to Alex Roman, Vice President of Apple’s money, where he spoke about how Apple had decided with the 27 percent commission outside the App Store.

“We do not strongly agree with this decision,” Apple’s spokesman Olivia told Dalton Wired in a statement. “We will obey the court order and we will apply.” Roman did not immediately respond to any request for comment.

Gonzalez Rogers quoted from 2021, saying that Apple’s Apple’s Chief Philip Shillor “suggested that Apple followed the order with the ban”, but the CEO ignored the Shiller and instead, Luca Mythry, and the chief financial officer, and his money to the team.

The judge claimed that Apple would immediately obey his previous order. “This is an order forbidden, not a discussion,” he wrote. “Once a party deliberately ignores the court order. The time is the main issue. The court will not tolerate further delay. As per the orders, Apple will not interrupt the competition.”

Epic Games CEO Tim Sine X posts The new judgment that will end the “15-30% junk fee of Apple”.

Update 4/30/25 10:00 ET: This story is updated with a statement from Apple.