Donald Trump’s NIH Pick Just Launched a Controversial Scientific Journal

Carl Bergstrome, a theoretical and evolutionary biologist, believes that the journal is part of an ongoing attempt to suspect scientific sense of scientific sens. “If you can create the idea that there is no priority in the opinion that the vaccine and masks are effective way to control the epidemic, but you can diminish the concept of scientific Sens Camity, you can create uncertainty and you can push an agenda forward. , “He says. He says peer-visited papers can provide politicians’ cover who want to make specific decisions and can be used in court as well.

Arriving on the phone on Thursday, Kuldorf said that Bhattacharya and Mackey were contacted to stay on the editorial board before Trump’s nomination. “Now, they are not active members of the board,” he said. (Bhattacharya and Makery are listed as “on vacation” on the journal website.) He added that there is no “connection” between the journal and the Trump administration.

Kuldorph told Ward that the journal would be a place for open speech and academic independence. “I think it is important that scientists think that they are important science, and then it should be open to discuss,” people do not stop publication, “Kuldorf says.

Epidemiologist CoolDarf and Andrew Nomar who was one of the UC Irvin Laborator The source of Covid, the journal editor is named as Chief. Scott Atlas, who was tapped by Trump at the White House Coronavirus Task Force in 2021, was also named as a member of the editorial board. By training has created the radiologist Atlas False Masks that do not work to prevent coronavirus expansion.

In January, Nomar wrote an OP-AID that supported Bhattacharya’s nomination for the NIH administrator. In this he praised Bhattacharya in various views for his free attitude. That o-aid Was published In Realcoliapolitics.

Angela Rasmusen, an American virologist and a research scientist at the University of Saskatchwan, says she has expressed concern that the journal can be used to propose and validate anti -health aspects. “I don’t think it will give any achievement to their true scientists. But the public may not know the difference between the Journal of Public Health and the New England Journal of Medicine, “he said.

Taylor Dotson, a professor of science and politics at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, says that studying the intersection of science and politics, there is a “legitimate concern” that the journal can become a repository for the Bolsters to prove the rational arguments on behalf of the administration. If confirmed that Bhattacharya and Makey’s boss may be likely to be Robert F. Kennedy Jr.Trump’s nominee for leading the Department of Health and Human Services, who is known to promote extensive scientific beliefs, including a connection that is not due to vaccine and autism and AIDS HIV virus.

Dotson warned that there was a risk that the existence of the journal with a particular political outlook could deepen science politics. “The worst situation is to start journals for journals for the kind of population and organization you read and the NPR and New York Times.”