Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

The European Supreme Court has weighted to clarify the rules around the Big Tea on the Big Tea on a referral on Google’s Android Auto Platform.
Back to 2021The Tech Giants hit the Italian competition authorities with € 100 million incredible penalties so that the energy company Angele X Italia integrates with its Android Auto platform, integrating a third -party electric car charging application by integrating it by a version of its mobile OS.
Google claimed that restrictions on Anell’s app were necessary to ensure that drivers were not confused – though the company approves inter -use of thousands of applications on its Android Auto Platform.
The Italian authorities took the opinion that Google’s primary block on Anell had abused an influential position because of the integration with Android Auto that the ability to attract customers angrily damaged the competition of another company. The judgment of the EU (CJEU) court on Tuesday was combined with the Watchdog assessment, as the court confirmed that denial of inter -use in the context of an influential market could be abused.
Although the ANL vs. Android Auto Case was already resolved – after Anell’s complaint, Google created a template for the electronic car charging applications that later began to accept itself – when the CJEU verdict came when the top technology of the market determines the conditions of the applicants that are inter -use. The key platforms are trying to plug on things that may have a broader applicability.
So when the court has discovered that the rejection of an influential market in terms of an influential market may be objectionable – including the platform itself “is not essential for the commercial operation of the app” – the judgment states that a rejection may be equitable for the time of access request “is any for any of the applications related applications. There is no template “by this topic; Or where inter -usefulness is “the platform will compromise with protection or integrity”.
CJEU says the request for an access that will become technically impossible is also a suitable reason for rejecting.
If none of these exceptions applies, the verdict says that the platform operator must fulfill the request for interpretation during the “reasonable and necessary” period. Depending on the situation, the court also said that a “appropriate” financial reward may apply.
In the case of any payment, Press release The court mentioned that “the need for a third party initiative needs to be considered that requested that development, the real expenses of development and the right to take initiative in an influential position to achieve appropriate benefits.”
CJEU reached the reaction to Ruling, Google spokesman Joe Ogunley emailed a statement to TechCrunch so the company expressed disappointment over the verdict.
Google, including Android Auto, has claimed that it has given the most need for drivers to start with media and messaging applications – it implies that if users are forced to redeem the restricted development resources in “specific companies’ request.
“Though we have now Opened The Enll feature requested that it was relevant to only 0.04% of Italy’s only 0.04% cars when ENL wanted it. We give priority to drivers ‘preferences in creating the most essential features because we believe that specific companies are not, users’ needs should be driven by, ” The
It is noteworthy that the European Union Digital Markets Act (DMA) also determines regional rules for the need for inter -useful requirements in large technologies Dominant messaging appsThe
However, the control of this ex -competition is only applicable to the technology giants that were previously nominated as the so -called gatekeeper by the European Commission, and only operates in the specific platform services (CPS) that nominates the EU. So Google is named as a DMA gatekeeper, but its Android Auto Platform is not currently a controlled CP.
However, as this CJEU’s verdict underscore, the requirements of inter -useful are still applicable to the extensive business interests of market leaders across the EU.