Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Next week, the company will start one of the most notable overhals of the company for how it does information on its platforms on its platforms.
March 18, Meta will begin publishing versions of community notes for Facebook, Instagram and thread users in the United States. The program copies a crowded factor-cheeking system that unveils the Twitter in 2021 and becomes the only means of correcting confusing data after the Elon musk platform is turned into X.
Meta Executives say they have focused on getting notes from the United States community before they can roll the feature in other countries. The most profitable market for America Meta, but in other regions like the European Union, the notes of communities may be to roll out, where the European commission is currently there, it may be a high-partner region to test a new feature, but may be meta Investigating X about the effectiveness of its community note characteristicsThe
This move may indicate an interest in satisfying the Trump administration of Mark Zuckerberg Mark Zuckerberg, which is before Meta is criticized for censoring conservative aspects.
Zuckerberg first announced these changes In January As part of a wide effort to give oxygen to more views on its platforms. Since 20 2016, Meta has relied on third -party fact checkers to verify information on its platforms, but VP Nil Pots of the Meta’s January Nil Pots told reporters at a briefing on Wednesday that systems were very biased, not enough skillful, and made many mistakes.
For example, Pots said that Meta had applied the false factor-cheeking label Opinion related to climate change It appeared in Fox News and Wall Street Journal. In another case, Zuckerberg recently said in Joe Damn’s Podcast that the meta should not be The anxiety around the Covid -19 vaccines rejected the incorrect information.
Meta hopes that the notes of the community will address the public concept that it is biased, less mistakes and presents more skeletal fact-checking systems that eventually addresses more incorrect information. However, the meta notes that this system does not replace community values ​​- the company’s rules that indicate whether the post is considered a disgusting speech, scandal or other forbidden material.
Meta’s contents overhaul come at a time when many technology companies are trying to address the Historical Tihamatic prejudice against conservatives. The X has led the industry’s efforts, demanding that Elon Kasturi center his social platform around “free speech”. Openai recently announced that it was changing how it trained in AI models Embrace “Buddhist Freedom”“And it says that it will not censor a certain view.
Rachel Lambert, director of Meta Product Management, said at the briefing on Wednesday that Meta closed its new fact-checking system with X’s Open-Source Algorithms around the notes of the community.
Open the meta Applications for contributors to its community note network In February. Meta contributors will be able to propose notes that claim the fact-check in a post directly on Facebook, Instagram or thread. Other contributors then do not identify a note as helpful or helpful, the community determines whether the note will appear to other users.
Like the X system, the Mater community evaluates the note systems that contributors usually do not agree on posts. Using this information, Meta will only show a note if the parties that usually oppose each other agree that a note is helpful.
Even if most contributors to Meta believe that a community note is needed, it does not mean that it will be shown. Further, Meta says that a community notes appear in a post, but it will not reduce any post or account in its algorithm.
Over the years, crowded systems like community notes have been seen as a committed solution to solve the misinformation on social media, but they have errors.
Positively, researchers have found that people see community notes more credible than the flags of third -party factor checkers, a survey published in the journal ScienceThe
In a larger size study about X’s Fact-Checking system, with researchers Luxembourg University It has been found that on average, posts, including the notes of the community connected to them, have reduced the expansion of misleading posts on average.
However many posts do not get the notes connected to them, or it takes a long time. Since X, and soon the meta, the anti-view contributors need the notes of the community to reach Con Kammai, which often means that the fact-checks are added only after reaching a post thousand or millions of people.
The same university survey of Luxembourg also found that the notes of the community could be very slow to interfere with the initial and most viral level of a post.
A recent study from Center for Digital Hate Counseling Highlight the condram. Researchers took a sample of posts containing the wrong information on X and found that contributors have suggested 81% of the time to the accurate, relevant information on these posts.
Nevertheless, the posts that received the suggestion were found in only 9% of contributors, which means a large majority of these posts did not appear with any true check.
