Meta Tries to Bury a Tell-All Book

It was a meta itself, which first talked me about the new book’s attack, Mark Zuckerberg, Sherill Sandberg and their company’s bankruptcy morality. March e March, a Meta PR person contacted me to ask if I heard that I heard Inadvertent, The company is an estimated techtown that was to be released within a few days. I didn’t have None of the Meta has read the book yet, but the Combs Department was already actively debanking it, issued a statement that the author was a former employee who was “finished” in 2017.

My first thought was Wow, I need to read this book! And in reality I did it, it swallowed it a night as it was published. To convenience of attention from Meta’s complaints, I suspect Inadvertent A must read a course. Meta – the company that promotes itself as an avatar of free speech – successfully confirmed to an arbitration Silent writer Sara Win-Wyliams, who was in charge of connecting Meta executives with world leaders. Depending on an NDA signed after the dismissal of Win-Wiliams, he stopped the book’s promotion, do everything in his power to stop his publication, and with all comments about the meta “to deny, critical or otherwise harmful.” This is quite the whole book. Win-Wyliams registered with SEC as a whistle blower did not attend the hearing and not seem to be at risk to respect it. I write like, Inadvertent Now Amazon’s third best -selling book.

The meta-friendly “Emergency” verdict of the arbitration was final against the book, which the company burst once after seeing the company. Even I have turned such pages InadvertentMy inbox was a fattening to transmit from the meta. “His book is a mix of old claims and false accusations about our executives,” said a company spokesperson. They are featured to run his shot as a result of “weak performance and toxic behavior.” They called him “an unsatisfactory worker trying to sell books”. Meanwhile, on social media, current and former employees have posted comments to protect the Malinde executives.

If the news is so old, one may ask why Meta is running atomic in Win-Wyliam? One thing is, its author was a senior executive who was in the house and was in a corporate jet, when the stuffs happened – and he claimed that things were worse than we imagine. Yes, Meta’s reckless neglect In MyanmarWhere people died in the trigger riots posted on Facebook, it was reported earlier, and the company has since apologized. However, the story of Win-Wyliam’s story is drawn where Meta leaders did not just think too much about the dangers there. Although Media writes about the obsession in Zuckerberg China in China, Win-Wyliams shared official documents that instructs the Chinese government for Meta face recognition and AI and say that the organization was behavior. So offensive The team that has made the title to show what the company should deal with when their plan is leaked. An example: “Nothing stops to go to Zuckerberg China.” The book that cannot be trusted while making a blanket statement, Meta did not specifically denied all these allegations. (In general

Nevertheless, in the context of what we already know about Meta, it is not shockingly not to say anything about the Win-Wiliams Company’s activities and inaction. Inadvertent This is not an investigating act, but a memoir, the descriptive thread is unrealistic to observe the company leaders. Given this personal focus, it is not surprising InadvertentIts most memorable moments do not come from Meta’s low quality corporate morality, but the gossip anecdotes on corporate planes or luxury hotels. High F. In spite of the Scott Fitzgeld title reference, most of the book reads like a big technology -thymized episode PuddleThe Win-Wyliams says that Sheryl Sandberg pressured him to share a bed mid-air, Materi Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan called him “abusive” and crushed against him during corporate retreat. (It managed to file her sexual harassment that Meta now says “confusing and baseless.”) Mark Zuckerberg think Andrew Jackson was the greatest president because he “completed” things. “

Can Can he be believed? Meta has called Win-Wiliams an incredible narrator and he is definitely self-conscious. I think he is not making things but spinning events in the least favorable light for his subjects and in the most favorable light for himself. And though he may not admit it, he is also one of the inadvertent. In his own account, he was Susan Collins A group of Facebook policies, morally tied his hands on questioning practice and sometimes objected – but in the end the flow is going on. He says he had planned to escape for years but could not afford to leave jobs and treatment coverage due to his serious health problems. Since he was a corporate director who compensated many million dollars and there are predetermined conditions for private health insurance in California, which is not true. He got stuck around until he was cans. By then, according to his own account, he was slowing down his efforts because he did not agree with his authority’s policies.