Nvidia Is Not Happy With the Gain AI Act, Says As Much

To attract enough attention across the technology industry, NVEDIA Corporation Has been publicly criticized The recently proposed Gain AI law, emphasizing the possibility of suppressing competition in the rapidly developed artificial intelligence sector.

Gain AI Act was introduced as part of the US National Defense Authority Act to guarantee access and innovation for the National Artificial Intelligence Act, with the goal of ensuring that the United States is the dominant market power for AI.

It has not yet been passed and it remains as heated controversial policies both here and abroad because it shows the restrictions that implement it.

Supporters say that it is to protect the American market interests by prioritizing domestic orders for advanced AI chips and processors, as well as reduce our dependence on foreign manufacturers, secure supply chains for critical AI hardware.

So it is not amazing that the Chinese corporation and the world’s largest company Nvidia will keep aiming a law that can probably limit foreign technology competition.

The company has said as much as a recent industrial forum.

“We never deprive American customers to serve other parts of the world. When trying to solve the problem that does not exist, the proposed bill will limit global competition in any industry that uses mainstream computing chips,” A spokesperson of Nvidia.

Gain AI Act is a good idea for innovation?

It depends on who you ask.

Basically, the law tries to strengthen national protection and economic competition by ensuring that the law is accessible to American companies and government agencies before supply abroad.

Its language takes a strict line about what should be a priority for the United States government.

“It should be the policy of the United States and Commerce Department, denying licenses for export of the most powerful AI chips, with 4,800 or more total processing power, with these national chips and the United States companies that cannot wait to achieve the same chips and are unable to obtain the same chips, to restrict the advanced artificial intelligence in foreign entities.” The law reads.

Nvidia’s criticism reflects a wide range of art concerns about the regulatory environment that can prevent innovation. As the global competition intensifies, with strong progress in AI, especially from China, agencies like Nvidia are closely monitoring how the regulatory structure is turning abroad.

However, it is not just a foreign company. American market players also say that it can strictly hurt a lot of domestic activities.

“Advanced AI Chips is Jet Engine that is about to enable the US AI industry to lead the next decade,” American President Brad Carson said in a wide distribution statement for Americans in the AI ​​industry’s lobbying group.

Carson said, “Worldwide, these chips are currently supposed to be supposed to, which means that every advanced chip sold abroad cannot use American research and development and economic growth in the United States,” Carson said. “We compete to lead this dual-usage technology, with the Gain AI law in NDA there will be a big win for national and national ProtectionThe “

‘Dumar Science Fiction’

Nvidia didn’t stop there. It then aimed at the previous attempt to make the United States more competitive in the Chipmeaker market, which was a policy called AI Rules, which eventually failed.

The company does not make any words a piece of In a follow-up statementIt is said that the past efforts to control the market forces on the basis of security policies were a bad idea in the end.

“The AI ​​spread rule was a self-defeated policy based on Dumar Science Fiction and it should not be restored,” it was written.

“Our sales to customers worldwide do not deprive our customers – and in reality many US businesses and industry expand the market,” it says. “Congress scholars about the supply of chips are trying to reverse President Trump’s AI action plan and surrender the opportunity to lead the US AI and worldwide computing.”

The challenge will create laws that are as dynamic as they manage, encouraging a climate where innovation and moral accountability are not mutually exclusive, but mutual strong.

We’ve tried it before

There was no accident in Nvidia about the rules of AI dispersion. This bad principle was a lot of the same political goals, but eventually stumbled on the finish line and had a relatively toothless effort to put several competitive companies in the world.

The AI ​​Planning Rules for the Biden Administration, made in January 2021, represent a significant change in the control of US exports that target Cutting-Edge artificial intelligence technology.

Designed to prevent the spread of advanced AI equipment in rival countries, the regulation is mandatory for licensing for selling high-end AI chips and strict caps on foreign recipients accessible computing power. Its aim was to slow down the expansion of sensitive AI capabilities that could enhance military or strategic applications abroad.

However, the method of export controls of the Trump-era, which focuses on the more targeted, bilateral structure, was ready to replace the broad strategy of the biden administration.

President Trump announced plans to withdraw the AI ​​dispersion rules, criticizing it excessively bureaucratic and potentially obstructing US innovation. Instead, his administration is more adapted, in favor of involvement in the country-specific agreement to control export practices for the case-case-case system.

Although the AI ​​dispersion rule has finally returned, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) refer to the implementation of existing regulations. The company has issued a notice to further strengthen the action against companies with a “high probability” of violation, warning that an increased investigation will be applied to the entity with potential violation knowledge.

It is still seen whether this latest attempt to advance American interests fulfills the same fate.