Outrage upgrades a plan to force all Gazani in the southern city

For the gas, the 60-day cessation of the fire, which is negotiated between Israel and Hamas, will be a rescue line.

A window for attracting large quantities desperately needed foods, water and medicines after heavy ones – and sometimes common – Israeli restrictions on supply to help.

But for Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz, a two -month pause in military operations would create the opportunity to build what he called a “humanitarian city” in the ruins of the southern city of Rafa to contain almost every Gazan, except those belonging to armed groups.

According to the plan, the Palestinians will be shielded before they are allowed and not allowed to leave.

Critics, both internally and internationally, have condemned the proposal, such as human rights groups, scientists and lawyers, calling it a “concentration camp” plan.

It is unclear to what extent it is a specific plan for the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or whether it is a tactic for negotiating to be more exerted on Hamas in talks on the termination transaction and hostages.

In the remarkable absence of some Israeli gas plan after the end of the war, this idea fills the strategic vacuum.

Katz informs a group of Israeli reporters that the new camp will initially house about 600,000 Palestinians – and ultimately the entire 2.1 million population.

His plan would see that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) provided the site at a distance while the international authorities ruled the area. Four places to distribute help will be established in the area, he said.

Katz also restored his desire to encourage Palestinians to “voluntarily emigrate” from gas to other countries.

But it has not acquired adhesion or support among other senior figures in Israel and, according to reports, the proposal even caused a clash between the Prime Minister and the IDF leader.

The Israeli media claim that the cabinet of the Chief of the General Staff, Lieutenant Gen Ael, made it clear that the army was not obliged to transfer forcibly civilians, as the plan would require.

It is alleged that the Gen of Zamir and Netanyahu were involved in an angry exchange during a recent meeting of the War Cabinet.

Tal Schneider, a political correspondent in the centrist times of Israel, said that it would be in a strong position to withdraw because the government “practically asks him to take up work” six months ago – and Netanyahu categorically approved his appointment.

Not only the top military brass is against the idea. There is also a horror among the rank and the file.

“Any transfer of a civil population is a form of a war crime.

A 28-year-old former armored body officer refuses to serve more in the army after 270 days of active battle in Gaza.

He describes himself as a patriot and claims that Israel must defend himself, but that the present war has no strategy or ends in sight.

Wilk is also part of the hostage soldiers, as a group calling for the end of the war to ensure the release of 50 Israelis who are still held captive by Hamas in Gaza, up to 20 of which are thought to be alive.

Meanwhile, 16 Israeli experts in international law issued a joint letter on Friday, which denied the plan, which they believe would be a war crime. The letter called on “all the countries concerned to withdraw publicly from the plan, to refuse it and to refrain from executing it.”

The plan surprisingly alarmed the Palestinians in Gaza.

“We are completely rejecting this proposal and rejecting the displacement of every Palestinian from their land,” said Sabren, who was forced to leave Khan Einnis before the BBC. “We are steadfast and we will stay here until our last breath.”

Ahmad al -Mgayar from Rafa said, “Freedom is above all. This is our land, we must be free to move where we want. Why is it pressured this way?”

It is unclear how much support the plan of the kat is among the general public, but recent studies have shown that the greater part of the Jews in Israel favors the expulsion of Gaza Palestinians.

A poll published in the left -wing daily Haaretz newspaper claims that 82 percent of the Jewish Israelis supported a similar move.

But there is a curious lack of public support for the proposal among the ultimate right, including prominent ministers in the Itarm Ben-Gvir coalition and a troubled troop.

Both are voice supporters of Palestinians who leave gas and Jewish settlers returning.

Tal Schneider said both ministers can still be weighed to support the mass camp proposal.

“Maybe they are waiting to see where the wind is blowing to see if it is serious. Both the Ben and Ben-Gvir are members of the cabinet and have more access to internal discussions. They may think that it is simply to put political pressure on Hamas to come to the table.”

Outside Israel, the proposal for a new camp for all Gazani has attracted a broad critic.

In the UK, the Minister of the Middle East, Hamish Falcon, has published on social media that he is “horrified” by the plan.

“The Palestinian territory should not be reduced,” he writes. “Civilians must be able to return to their communities. We must focus on a transaction to end the fire and open a way to lasting peace.”

British human rights lawyer Baroness Helena Kennedy KK told the BBC that the project would force the Palestinians in a “concentration camp”.

The description that other critics, including academics, NGOs and senior UN officials, have used, has significant resonance in the light of the role of concentration camps in the Holocaust.

Baroness Kennedy said the plan – as well as Israel’s most recent actions – made her conclude that Israel was performing a genocide in gas.

“I was very reluctant to go there because the threshold should be very high. There must be a specific intention for genocide. But what we see now is genocidal behavior,” she said.

Israel has flatly rejected the accusation of genocide and says it is not aimed at civilians.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry also told the BBC that “the idea that Israel creates concentration camps is deeply offensive and attracts parallels with the Nazis.” Israel “adheres to the Geneva Convention,” she added, citing international regulations governing the treatment of civilians in occupied territories.

In addition to gloomy warnings about what can happen, the prospect of a new camp has an impact on efforts to end the Gaza war.

Palestinian sources during the negotiations on the termination of fire that are ground in the Qatar capital Doha told the BBC that the plan was worried by Hamas’s delegation and created a new obstacle to a deal.

Additional reporting by Joyce Li and John Landi