Reputation is exhausted as the United Kingdom, France and Canada, which require the Gaza offensive in Israel

Israel went to war after Hamas’ attacks on October 7, 2023, armed with an arsenal of weapons paid most, delivered and then restored by the United States.

His other allies gave Israel something just as powerful in their own way: a deep merit of goodwill and solidarity, based on aversion to the killings of 1,200 people, mostly Israeli civilians, and the view of 251 people to be captured in Gaza as hostages.

Now it seems that Israel’s merit has reached, at least as far as France, the United Kingdom and Canada. They have issued their strongest condemnation so far to the way Israel waged the war in Gaza.

Israel, they say, must stop him New offensivewhich Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he will destroy Hamas, save the other hostages and put a whole gas under direct Israeli military control.

Their statement rejects Netanyahu’s arguments and calls for the cessation of fire. Together, the three governments say that they “strongly oppose the expansion of Israel’s military operations in Gaza”, adding: “The level of human suffering in gas is intolerable.”

They call for the release of other hostages and recall that after the “vile attack” on October 7, they believe that the Israeli state “has the right to defend Israelis against terrorism. But this escalation is completely disproportionate.”

Netanyahu’s decision to allow what he called “minimal” food in gas was that they said “completely inadequate.”

Netanyahu stepped back, saying that “London leaders, Otova and Paris offer a huge award for the genocidal attack on Israel on October 7 as they invited more similar atrocities.”

He insisted that the war could end if Hamas returned hostages, put on his weapons, agreed his leaders to go into exile, and Gaza was demilitarized. “It cannot be expected to accept something smaller and Israel certainly is gone,” he said.

Netanyahu – who has been sought under an international criminal order for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, which he rejected as “anti -Semitic” – was under strong international pressure to end Gaza’s blockade after a respected international study warned of immediate hunger.

At the London summit between the EU and the United Kingdom, European Council President Antonio Costa called the Humanitarian Crisis in the Gaza Tragedy, in which international law is systematically violated and the entire population is subjected to disproportionate military force.

“There must be safe, quick and unobstructed access for humanitarian aid,” he said.

Netanyahu’s unwanted decision to allow in limited supplies was convicted by his ultra -nationalist coalition partners.

Security Minister Itariam Ben Guir, convicted in 2007 for inciting racism and supporting the extremist Jewish group, which Israel classified as a terrorist organization, complained that Netanyahu’s decision would “nourish Hamas and give him oxygen as our hostages fall into tunnels.”

Only five trucks entered Gaza on Monday, as Israeli troops advanced both air and artillery strikes killed more Palestinian civilians, including very young children.

Opponents of the destruction of Israel by Gaza and the murder of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians will say that the governments of France, the United Kingdom and Canada speak too late.

Many of them have held months of demonstrations that protesters about the death and destruction of Gaza – and more murder of Palestinian civilians and confiscation of the Earth on the west coast, the other side of the Palestinian territories, during military operations and raids from armed Jewish settlers.

But sometimes in the policy of war, an incident carries a symbolic power that clarifies and crystallizes so sharply that it can force governments to act. This time it was the murder of March 23 by the Israeli forces in Gaza of 15 paramedics and assistants.

He came after Israel, on March 18, interrupted the cessation of the fire, which took place for two months with a series of massive air strikes.

Five days in the updated war, the Israeli squad attacked the medical convoy and covered the men they killed and their bullets ridden vehicles with the sand. The Israeli story of the incident was incorrect when a mobile phone was restored from a body in the mass grave.

His owner had filmed the incident before he was killed. Far from Israel’s claim that emergency workers are a potential threat to Israeli war soldiers, the video from the grave shows that clearly marked and well -lit ambitions and emergency vehicles were systematically attacked until almost all inside them were killed.

The alarm has grown rapidly since then, not only among Israel’s usual opponents. Its European allies, such as President Macron on France, leads the way, strengthen their language. The statement calling for the end of Israel’s offensive is their most ranked criticism of Israel so far.

A senior European diplomatic source involved in their discussions told me that the difficult language reflects “the true sense of growing political anger in the humanitarian situation, on a cross -line line and the Israeli government seems to act with impunity.”

More delicious for Israel, the statement states that “we will not stand until the Netanyahu government is pursuing these outrageous actions. If Israel does not terminate the updated military offensive and will raise its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take additional specific steps in response.”

They do not specify what these can be. Sanctions can be one of the options. A bigger step would be to recognize Palestine as an independent state.

France is considering joining 148 other states who made it at a conference, she co -chairs with Saudi Arabia in New York in early June. The United Kingdom also speaks of Palestinian recognition with the French.

Israel, pressing backwards, told them that they would present Hamas Victory. But the tone of the statement made by the French, Canadians and British suggest that Israel is losing its ability to press them.