Trump believes to join Israel’s strikes at Iranian nuclear objects

US President Donald Trump is considering joining Israel’s strikes at Iran’s nuclear sites as the conflict continues for the sixth day and angry rhetoric is increasing between all countries.

US strokes may include the use of a superb weapon to fall underground nuclear facility in Fordo, according to five sources that spoke with the US partner of BBC News CBS News.

The president met with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss the next steps.

Israel and Iran have exchanged deadly blows from Friday. Analysts say Trump’s comments suggest that he willing to join the Israelis, despite his earlier call for de-escalation and his voice support for a diplomatic decision to limit Iran’s nuclear research.

He showed increasing dissatisfaction with the perceived lack of progress in order to provide a new transaction aimed at preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon. Trump withdrew from a previous agreement with Iran during his first term.

In a social media publication on Tuesday, Trump threatened that Iran’s supreme leader Ali Hamenei and said the United States knew where he was.

“It’s an easy target, but it’s safe there,” Trump wrote. “We will not bring him out (kill!), At least not for now. But we do not want rockets shooting at civilian or American soldiers. Our patience is thinning.”

Another post from Trump just read: “Unconditional show!”

On Wednesday, Iran’s supreme leader responded directly to the comments and stated that the country would never surrender.

“Any form of US military intervention will undoubtedly be met with irreparable harm,” Hamenei said.

“The wise people who know Iran, his people and his history never speak to this nation in the language of threats, because the Iranians are not the ones who give up,” he added.

The United States insisted that Iran should scrap the enrichment of uranium in order to prevent the development of the country of nuclear weapons – although Iran insists that its nuclear activities be completely calm.

Trump withdrew from a previous nuclear agreement between Iran and five other world forces in 2018. After returning to office, he sent negotiators to try to reach a new agreement with the nation in the Middle East, without a breakthrough.

Trump seems to have cooled from traditional diplomacy in recent days. On Tuesday, while traveling back to the United States from the G7 summit in Canada, he said “it’s not much in the mood to negotiate with Iran.”

Trump’s disappointed language suggested that he was crossing a threshold, which would be “very difficult to get together,” Professor Amenian Aran, an Israeli foreign policy expert, told BBC Radio 5 Live.

“We are definitely the closest we have been” until the US entered the conflict since it started, he added.

Other experts have suggested that Trump may be forced to act. Former Israeli US ambassador Michael Oren speculates that the president will feel that he has little choice but to intervene if Iran attacked an American ship or base.

However, such an attack may be an Iranian tactic to encourage Trump to press Israel to negotiate to end the fighting, told BBC Radio 4 Today.

Trump himself told reporters about his return from G7 that his goal is “end, real end, not reconciliation.” His comments came only hours after he joined other leaders in the Western Alliance when issuing a statement called for de -escalation in the Middle East.

Trump left the summit early to respond to the Washington crisis before a series of statements left observers unclear how he could choose to go.

A message calling for Iranians to evacuate Tehran similarly, caused a storm of speculation, as well as anxiety in the Iranian capital itself.

US Secretary of Defense Pete Heget earlier announced the “deployment of additional opportunities” in the Middle East to improve the Pentagon’s “protective posture”, despite the denial of US officials at the time they joined the hostilities.

At least 30 US military aircraft have been moved from bases to America in Europe over the last three days, the flight tracking data reviewed by the BBC showed.

It was unclear if US movements were directly related to the Israeli-Iran conflict, but an expert said that flights to tanker aircraft were “extremely unusual”.

Another expert said that movements could be part of a broader policy of “strategic ambiguity” aimed at influencing Iran to make discounts.

The signing of Israeli hostilities has no complete agreement by Trump’s closest counselors, CBS reported. But the disagree votes did not publish publicly.

There is also a wide range of views at Trump’s supporters. The Republican is running for re -election on the basis of being separated from America from conflicts abroad and has previously criticized the US intervention in the Middle East.

On the issue of Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon, there seems to be a different rating from Trump and his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabard.

Asked Tuesday about Gabard’s more proposal that Iran was not working on a nuclear warhead, Trump replied: “I don’t care what he said. I think they were very close to having it.”

Later, the advisers of both Trump and Gabard denied the couple disagreed with the matter.

There was no death on Tuesday night on Wednesday in Israel by Iranian missile attacks.

And more than 50 Israeli fighters who conducted operations in Iran overnight, with strikes of an Iranian centrifuge facility, rocket production near Tehran and a university related to the revolutionary security of Iran.

Israel is the main partner of America in the Middle East and Trump continues to stand next to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against the background of the widespread international condemnation of Israel’s hostilities in Gaza following Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.